the art of boredom

Month
Filter by post type
All posts

Text
Photo
Quote
Link
Chat
Audio
Video
Ask

March 2012

Mar 31, 2012 3 notes
Mar 30, 2012 155 notes
Mar 30, 2012
#tretorn #nylites
Mar 30, 2012 74 notes
Mar 30, 2012 529 notes
Mar 29, 2012
Mar 29, 2012 8,368 notes
#Italy #Fashion #Menswear #Travel
Mar 29, 2012 163 notes
Mar 29, 2012 716 notes
Mar 29, 2012 314 notes
#menswear
Are DJs, Rappers and Bloggers ‘Curators’?aam-us.org

roguebicycles:

“The growing use of the term ‘curator’ in other fields, while misleading to many, fools no one who is actually in the industry and knows about the scope of activities that a curator undertakes. The use and abuse of the term outside the field indicates how opaque the contemporary art world and its processes may be to the rest of society, but perhaps we should welcome this as a teaching moment, where what curators do can be discussed and illuminated in a broader context.”

Kristen Hileman, curator of contemporary art and department head of the Baltimore Museum of Art, says that while she wasn’t overly aware of the definition creep of “curate,” she’s fine with one field borrowing terminology from another: “In fact, it is intriguing to think there is something so evocative in the vocabulary describing my job that others want to use it to articulate their own abilities or services. One of the legacies of 20th-century art has been a thorough appropriation of the everyday, so how could one object to the non-art world stealing something in return?”


The word “curate” could be attractive because of its implied prestige, suggesting that objects, experiences or people are being chosen and presented by an expert best equipped with the necessary knowledge and experience. Hileman says, “In short, I can see the appeal of a knowledgeable specialist making selections or recommendations in an information and image-saturated culture.” She adds, “I would also speculate that, in time, the use or overuse of the term might rob it of some of its preciousness, which isn’t necessarily a bad thing, since contemporary curators bring other skills to the table beyond connoisseurship.”

i hate the word abuse.

Mar 29, 2012 64 notes
Mar 29, 2012 90 notes
#boggi
Play
Mar 29, 2012 155 notes
#'Lo Heads #Polo #Polo Ralph Lauren
Mar 29, 2012 174 notes
#menswear
Mar 29, 2012 507 notes
Mar 28, 2012 791 notes
Mar 24, 2012 1 note
Mar 21, 2012 175 notes
#capsuleny
Mar 21, 2012
#Sid Mashburn
Mar 21, 2012 3 notes
#menswear #GQ #dead
Why Millennials Want To Be Richgood.is

youmightfindyourself:

A new study on different generations’ priorities does not make Millenials look good. The report from the American Psychological Association [PDF] claims we are selfish, fame-seeking, politically disengaged, anddon’t give a shit about the environment. We also want to be rich. A stunning 75 percent of Millennials said that being wealthy was very important to them, compared to 45 percent of baby boomers and 70 percent of Generation X. 

Contrary to middle-aged pundits’ rants, Millennials are not inherently more selfish or materialistic than previous generations. It’s just that we are seeing the middle class vanish before our eyes. Even before the recession, we heard the message loud and clear: If you don’t want to be poor, you have to be rich.

Read on.

Mar 20, 2012 84 notes
#ballin #wall of text #economy
Mar 19, 2012 434 notes
#menswear #quotes
Play
Mar 19, 2012 290 notes
#Lights Out
Mar 17, 2012 62 notes
Mar 16, 2012 848 notes
Mar 15, 2012 218 notes
Mar 15, 2012 14 notes
“I remember thinking during my teens and twenties that WHAT I DID was all that mattered. Now I think back and realize that WHAT I DIDN’T DO was what mattered.”—(via youbroketheinternet)
Mar 15, 2012 61 notes
Mar 15, 2012 1,301 notes
#Menswear
Mar 15, 2012 917 notes
Mar 15, 2012 161 notes
#Lino #Al Bazar #Milan #Menswear #Italy
“Last night, atop an impossibly garish neon-lit stage, television and televised commercials reached a horrible event horizon in Fashion Star, America’s first primetime network show in which product placement supplants entertainment completely. It was vapid, tacky, and embarrassing.
But it’s going to make a shit ton of money, so we’re probably stuck with it.
On Fashion Star, designers parade their designs before a studio audience and two judging panels: Celebrity fashion “mentors” like Jessica Simpson and Nicole Richie, and “buyers” from Macy’s, H&M, and Saks Fifth Avenue. If the buyers like the clothes, they bid on them; by the end of the night, winning designs are available for purchase on the stores’ websites. In theory, this is a show about the practical side of the fashion industry. Where Project Runway is designed to explore creativity, Fashion Star is designed to explore retail.
In practice, it’s just the Home Shopping Network working the pole in Vegas. Literally. Cage dancers and a fog machine accompany runway presentations. The judging is meaningless. Buyers’ bids are plucked out of thin air. Apparently $50,000 is a reasonable offer, but why? Are the buyers paying for the design, or an order of completed garments? Sometimes the stores sell all three outfits from the contestant’s mini-collections. Sometimes they sell two orjust one. These details, however, are beside the point. The point is that absolutely anything that appears on TV or near a celebrity will sell. It’s the same principle that made the Kardashians, the Hiltons, and even the unfathomably dull Lauren Conrad into branding juggernauts: If on TV, then famous. If famous, then desirable.
Three of the garments from last night’s Fashion Star (a maxi dress, a mini dress, and a mini skirt) have already sold out. Yes, they may resemble clothing you’ve already seen in countless stores, but as one contestant explained, “You haven’t seen it with my label before.” Nor have you seen it with this level of interactive multimedia marketing.
The New York Times gave Fashion Star a rave review. “It’s the ultimate in product placement, a new achievement, if that’s the word, in the transformation of television into one giant commercial,” Neil Genzlinger writes. “But dang it, it’s kind of fun.”
No, it’s not. It’s a dystopic nightmare where no moments of our lives are without corporate sponsorship. Though impressive from a logistical standpoint (Can you imagine the contracts and legal stipulations involved in getting all these corporations, manufacturers, and “media personalities” working in tandem on an airtight schedule?), I’d rather rubberneck at emotionally abusive adults traumatizing children (Dance Moms, Toddlers & Tiaras) or violent alcoholics attacking strangers (Jersey Shore, The Real World) or freak show presentations of mental illness (Hoarders, My Strange Addiction) than submit to the acquisitive stupor of Fashion Star.”
—Disco Stu doesn’t advertise: Maureen O'Connor on Fashion Star 
Mar 15, 2012 5 notes
#Fashion Star #oy
Mar 13, 2012 114 notes
#economy #never forget #be excellent to each other
Artist suspends real clouds in the middle of the roomio9.com

singularitarian:

External image

That’s not photoshop; that’s an actual cloud hovering inside an actual room. Artist Berndnaut Smilde merges art and science to create small man-made clouds that exist — albeit for just a moment — indoors.

Mar 13, 2012 3,205 notes
Mar 13, 2012
#menswear #MONSIEUR JEROME
Mar 7, 2012
#sheepsheadfuckingbay
“You owe the companies nothing. Less than nothing, you especially don’t owe them any courtesy. They owe you. They have re-arranged the world to put themselves in front of you. They never asked for your permission, don’t even start asking for theirs.”—Banksy (via sirmitchell)
Mar 6, 2012 1,825 notes
#quotes
Mar 6, 2012 207 notes
#Lapo Elkann
Mar 5, 2012 1 note
#Nike
Mar 5, 2012 3 notes
#vandafineclothing #menswear
Mar 5, 2012 2 notes
#menswear #Mitsuru Strano
Play
Mar 5, 2012 1,127 notes
Mar 1, 2012 17 notes
#WIWT #menswear #gpoy
Mar 1, 2012
#Ovadia and Sons #menswear
Mar 1, 2012 2 notes
#menswear #LBM 1911
Mar 1, 2012 5 notes
#Finamore #menswear
Mar 1, 2012 151 notes
#menswear
Next page →
20182019
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
201720182019
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
201620172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
201520162017
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
201420152016
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
201320142015
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
201220132014
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
201120122013
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
201020112012
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
20102011
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December